Abhijeet Dipke, Two CJP Leaders to Appear Before Executive Magistrate After Delhi Detention

New Delhi, October 11, 2026: Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) founder Abhijeet Dipke and party leaders Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das are scheduled to appear before an executive magistrate at Delhi Cantonment Police Station following their detention ahead of a planned demonstration at Jantar Mantar. The three leaders were detained by Delhi Police shortly after arriving in the national capital on Saturday, October 10.

The detention came amid heightened security arrangements across Delhi as authorities moved to prevent an unauthorised gathering linked to the party’s protest campaign. The leaders had travelled from Mumbai to participate in the demonstration, which called for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

CJP Leaders Detained After Flight Arrives in Delhi

Dipke, Ranka and Das were taken into custody after their aircraft landed at Indira Gandhi International Airport. Videos circulating online showed police personnel entering the aircraft and escorting the leaders away.

The incident occurred hours before the planned gathering at Jantar Mantar. The party had mobilised supporters around concerns regarding the revision of electoral rolls and allegations of irregularities in the process.

CJP representatives criticised the police action and maintained that the organisation intended to continue its campaign despite the detention of its senior members. The development also drew attention to the wider restrictions imposed on individuals attempting to participate in the proposed demonstration.

According to reports citing Delhi Police, the three leaders were placed under preventive arrest and were expected to be produced before an executive magistrate at Delhi Cantonment Police Station at 9 am on Sunday, October 11.

Protest Focuses on Election Commission and Voter Lists

The demonstration was organised to demand the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. CJP and its supporters have raised concerns about the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, arguing that the process requires greater accountability and transparency.

The revision exercise has become a subject of political debate, particularly over questions surrounding the inclusion and removal of names from voter lists. Concerns raised by political groups and activists have intensified calls for explanations about how electoral records are reviewed and corrected.

The allegations remain contested, and claims of irregularities should be distinguished from findings established through official investigations or judicial proceedings.

Security Restrictions Affect Planned Gathering

Delhi Police had declined permission for the proposed Jantar Mantar demonstration, citing procedural and security-related concerns. Authorities also implemented extensive security measures to manage the anticipated gathering and prevent protesters from reaching restricted areas.

The police action extended beyond the three CJP leaders, with reports of detentions involving activists, political figures and other individuals connected with the protest. The scale of the operation brought renewed attention to the balance between maintaining public order and protecting the right to peaceful assembly.

Jantar Mantar is a designated protest location in the national capital, but demonstrations remain subject to applicable permissions and restrictions. Authorities can impose lawful measures to address public-order concerns, while the exercise of those powers remains subject to constitutional and legal safeguards.

CJP Signals Continuation of Campaign

Despite the detention of its prominent leaders, the organisation indicated that its protest campaign would continue. Ajinkya Shinde, who holds an organisational leadership role within CJP, was identified as a key figure expected to coordinate the party’s next steps.

The immediate development is the scheduled appearance of Dipke, Ranka and Das before the executive magistrate. The proceedings are expected to clarify the next steps in the preventive action taken against them.

The broader dispute surrounding the planned demonstration highlights continuing tensions over electoral accountability, public protest and the limits of police intervention. Further developments will depend on the outcome of the magistrate proceedings and any subsequent decisions by the authorities or the organisation.